Compare

Cartographer, git history and a chat summary

Three records of the same work, answering three different questions. What each one keeps, what each one drops, and why you want all three.

 Git historyA chat summaryA Cartographer map
RecordsWhat changed: commits, diffs, branchesWhat the agent remembers, in proseEvery move: what you did, what happened, what it meant, the outcome, your response
EvidenceThe diff itselfNone requiredEach move lists the timeline items it rests on; saving rejects a move without them
Dead endsInvisible unless committedUsually left outKept, marked, and read for what they cost
Your promptsNot recordedParaphrasedRead one by one: the act, the anchor, how it was said, and where a correction marks the previous move as wrong for you
PraiseNot applicableCommonRejected on save, in the map and in the appraisal
The verdictWhether it mergedWhatever the summary saysWaits for /complete, judged against the goal you declared, because a session cannot judge itself
Where it livesThe repoThe chat~/.cartographer on your machine, as JSON maps and rendered replays

The short version

Git is the record of the result. A chat summary is the agent's recollection of the process. A map is the process, read from the record, under rules. Use all three; they do not compete.

If you want to see what the third one looks like on a real build, the demo replay is one. How it works explains the five parts of a move and the yardstick the appraisal reads them against.

Questions

Does Cartographer replace git?

No. Git records what changed and Cartographer records how you got there. They answer different questions about the same work.

Why not just ask the agent to summarise the session?

You can, and it will. A summary is prose with no rules: it can praise, skip the dead ends, and cite nothing. A map has five fixed parts per move, cites the timeline it rests on, and rejects praise words on save. The difference shows up the third time you read one.

Is the map written by a different model?

It is written by the agent that was in the session, following a brief. That is why it knows what you meant. The rules are enforced by Cartographer when the map is saved, not by the model's good intentions.